The court gave its landmark ruling after hearing the case of a 48-year-old woman, convicted of giving false testimony to police by denying she had lent her mobile phone to her lover. 続きを読む 3 コメント
『It once gave a ruling, later rescinded after protests from women's groups, that a woman could not be raped by definition if she was wearing tight jeans, since the jeans could only be removed with her consent.』
コメント
id:activecute さん経由／歴史修正主義は科学でも認識でもなく、とどのつまりは愛情のもつれマターだということがよくわかるエントリ。ちなみにイタリアは「ジーンズ脱ぐには本人の協力」判決で有名だからいたしかたなし
ビッチ支援国家。読んで、信じられなくて読み返して、初めに読んだ理解で正しかったことが確認できた後に、ハー？ハー？と叫んでしまった。 > "It said bending the truth was justified to conceal extra-marital relationships."
『It once gave a ruling, later rescinded after protests from women's groups, that a woman could not be raped by definition if she was wearing tight jeans, since the jeans could only be removed with her consent.』